Computer Graphics World

November / December 2016

Issue link: https://digital.copcomm.com/i/759864

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 22 of 35

n o v e m b e r . d e c e m b e r 2 0 1 6 c g w 2 1 concentrate on making him real, not on making the performance." Gnarlack is not the only goblin in the film. Manz, who had supervised the work on Dobby while at Framestore for The Deathly Hallows, Part One, notes that one goblin even appears in only two shots. "Five years ago, we wouldn't have invested the time and money into creating a goblin for two shots," Manz says. "For this film, we wanted to elevate the goblins. The audience is so sophisticated now. They expect to see muscles moving under the skin, all those things we can do well now. We even have a five-minute scene with a CG goblin talking to an actor." CONSTRUCT, DECONSTRUCT, CONSTRUCT As is typical in action/adventure films, visual effects artists build sets and creatures, and then the creatures destroy the sets. One such creature in Fantastic Beasts, the Obscurus – more energy than character – is a good example. "Double Negative did a lot of work to determine how it looks," Burke says. "It doesn't have one form. It takes differ- ent forms. It's an invisible force, so they created a membrane type of thing. It isn't a creature with a head, but sometimes you see the host within it." In the third act, this creature causes destruction throughout New York. "DNeg London worked aboveground, and DNeg Vancouver did subterranean work and destruction," Burke points out. "We used [Side Effects Soware's] Houdini to animate shapes and drive simulations for all the destruction. We tore up New York." "And, we didn't just destroy it, we fixed it as well," Manz says. "We have pieces flying back into the right place. That was the sort of stuff for which we shot a lot of elements. But none of it was used. It was more flexible to do it with CG." Flexibility to use CG was, in a way, a theme for the making of this film, starting with the beginning. The flexibility to incorporate CG at the start helped the entire process. "Creature design always serves a pur- pose," Burke says. "Before, on Potter, we'd scan a maquette and try to fix the creature in post. But now, because we were creating it and animating it, we knew what it was. All the creatures had character. That helped everyone. It helped Eddie [Redmayne]. It helped the director." And as for the environment and sets, on Potter, the actors were originally always in a four-walled set. "But on the fourth, and certainly by the fih, Stuart [Craig] started opening up the space. Digital set extensions let his imagination run free," Burke continues. "He knows we can create photographic set extensions. He embraces this process." It has been more than 20 years since Jurassic Park's digital dinosaurs made movie history by convincing filmmakers that CG characters could be real and practical. Now, finally, filmmakers are giv- ing the creature creators an earlier voice in the process. Director Yates has reportedly signed on for four sequels. It will be fascinating to see how the process evolves as the Fantastic Beasts franchise unfolds. The result can only be fantastic. NEWT SCAMANDER (EDDIE REDMAYNE) PLAYS WITH PICKETT, HIS PERSONAL BOWTRUCKLE. Barbara Robertson (BarbaraRR@comcast.net) is an award-winning writer and a contributing editor for CGW.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Computer Graphics World - November / December 2016