Post Magazine

June 2014

Issue link:

Contents of this Issue


Page 12 of 51 Post • June 2014 11 who plays the Knotgrass; Lesley Manville, who plays the character Flittle; and Juno Temple plays Thistletwit. In the second act of the film they are live action, but in the first and third, they are pixie versions of themselves, so right off the bat, it was critical that there were simi- larities that could call back to the live-action versions of themselves. We wanted to 'pixify' or [add] some slight stylization, but maintain a very photorealistic quality. "The characters themselves are extraordi- narily complex in terms of their hairstyles — long, curly hair on Thistletwit. Their costumes are made of multiple layers of leaves and flower petals…seeds from dandelions and grasses, that all have to interact with the dif- ferent layers and their body. There is small, delicate facial hair and body hair. We spent an enormous amount of time working on getting very accurate eyes, looking at muscle and connective tissue." POST: How did you manage it? PORT: "What we did was start with the actress' head, and took incredibly high-resolu- tion scans, down to the pore level of detail, and worked on the skin shaders and the hair and eyes. We were able to create a digital version of the actor, where you could put it side by side and couldn't tell the difference. At that point, we knew we hit the realism target, and then could go into making the pixie ver- sion of that. We created three completely photorealistic versions of the actors, which are never seen in the film, but it was critical for us to use it as a milestone and target because if right off the bat you go into a styl- ized version of an actor, you can't ever be 100 percent sure that you hit that realism target." POST: You must have needed access to the talent early on? PORT: "We had them early on, [but] not all at once, because of scheduling. We were able to get Lesley Manville, first. She was the initial development, and then we worked on the other two when we were able to get their scans. We worked with the ICT Group here in Los Angeles, using their scanning equipment. We've worked with them quite a bit in the past and have a good working relationship." POST: How was the work split up between Digital Domain's Los Angeles and Vancouver facilities? PORT: "We had a group, mostly in Vancou- ver, that was working on Maleficent and the wings. Generally speaking, the pixies were being done here in Los Angeles. The produc- tion team was in Vancouver quite a bit. There was a little bit of cross pollination for sure, but generally, that's how it was divided up." POST: How much manpower did you have to allocate to this film? PORT: "It varied. We had close to 500 people actually working on the show, not at [the same] moment, but who actually touched the show. I'd say we had close to 300. That would be a good, solid team size." POST: When did you get involved? PORT: "I started when the shoot started. In fact, the shoot had been going on for a couple of weeks. I started in late August of 2012, so we've been involved for close to two years — over two years if you include the initial prep and bidding." POST: Were the VFX scenes shot against a blue screen? PORT: "[There were] a lot of blue screens on-set for set replacement, or things that need to be done with live-action characters, or partial sets. That was all shot at Pinewood in the UK. The backgrounds and plates all hap- pened on-set. Any additional digital work [was] done at various studios in LA, Vancou- ver and London." POST: What were they shooting with? PORT: "They used the Arri Alexa. Most of the cameras were modified at the time…We had a few element shoots that happened probably six months ago in the UK. They went back and shot some flowers, grass and differ- ent trees. As you progress further into the shots and have a good idea of where you are going, you know you are missing something. It would be great to have a little grass or fore- ground flowers, and you go back and shoot generic elements that can be used for that." POST: How many shots was Digital Domain responsible for? PORT: "We had a dramatic change, but I think it was close to 600. MPC may have had more. They had a lot of character shots in the fairly-land environment. The production also had a small group of artists working on a few hundred shots as well." POST: You must have an established toolset for a film workflow? PORT: "Primarily, the base tools are Maya for modeling, animation and rigging. A lot of that is used as the base application, but we have a lot of proprietary tools for making those specialty rigs and models. Houdini, typi- cally, we used for effects like water and clouds, and any kind of light effects or particle simula- tions — things like that. And for compositing and putting it all together, we use Nuke." POST: Were the pixies the biggest challenge on this film? PORT: "That was definitely one of the harder parts — finding the true essence of the character but still maintaining that stylized version. The eyes were slightly bigger. The nose was slightly smaller. The whole body was smaller. Finding these characteristics of each individual actor and making sure it translated into the pixie version without losing the essence, discovering that essence was critical. We wanted to smooth out or reduce wrin- kles, or adjust the eyes, but if you went too far, it would not look like them anymore. You had to be really careful with that." MPC's Los Angeles and Vancouver facilities shared VFX duties.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Post Magazine - June 2014