Location Managers Guild International

Summer 2021

The Location Managers Guild International (LMGI) is the largest organization of Location Managers and Location Scouts in the motion picture, television, commercial and print production industries. Their membership plays a vital role in the creativ

Issue link: https://digital.copcomm.com/i/1387559

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 50 of 63

LMGI COMPASS | Summer 2021 • 51 that private parties, including security guards, have very limited rights to detain you against your will. Furthermore, private parties have no right to inspect or delete your images and certainly are not allowed to take your equipment. Although law enforcement offi cers may have the authority to seize fi lm when making an arrest, they otherwise must obtain a court order. Unless they have reasonable grounds to suspect that you are committing a crime (unlikely), they are not entitled to inspect or delete your images without a warrant or court order. Copyright Issues Copyright issues can be problematic for location scouts considering that many production companies are unwilling to be reasonable with respect to intellectual property issues. Although a production company would rarely have a legitimate business reason to demand that a location scout transfer the ownership of copyrights to their photographs, this is an industry in which reasonableness is not always an underlying principle of doing business. In any case, whatever concerns a production company might have could be resolved by the location scout granting a nonexclusive license to use the images. Furthermore, there are some valid business reasons for location scouts to retain the copyrights to their photographs. One such reason is that ownership of the copyright is necessary if you want to be able to legally reuse the photographs for future projects. For example, if you have previously photographed a potential site for a previous production company, and the site appears to be a good candidate for a later project, it would make sense to be able to present the previously taken photographs to the producer of the later project. However, if those photographs are now owned by the previous production company, reusing them would technically be an infringement of the copyright. A typical clause in an agreement with a production company will deem that you are an "employee for hire" and that your photographs will constitute a "work made for hire" that was specially commissioned by the production company. The effect of being an employee for hire is that everything you create during the assignment will be treated legally as if the production company itself made the work. Although it is questionable whether a work- for-hire provision would actually apply to a photograph that is not incorporated into the fi lm itself, such agreements typically have a provision that requires you to assign your copyrights to the production company. So, irrespective of the whether the photographs actually constitute works for hire, the assignment provision will generally be effective with respect to giving the production company the rights to your work. Finally, agreements commonly require that you either waive or transfer your "moral rights of authors." Such rights in the United States are granted to a narrow category of artistic works and are not likely to be applicable to photographs taken while location scouting. One possible way to ameliorate the harshness of such provisions would be to negotiate a rider to the agreement which states that you are giving the production company an unexclusive license to use the photographs but that you are retaining the copyrights. Such a rider would allow you to use the images for future projects. Likewise, the rider could restrict the transfer of rights to images that are actually provided to the production company. Using a rider instead of trying to modify the text of the agreement itself is more likely to be acceptable to a production company. Of course, if the answer is a fl at no, your choice is limited to whether or not you want to do the work. An interesting question is how such agreements apply to previously created photographs such as those you might have in your portfolio of potential locations that has been assembled in your free time. Such photographs would have been created outside of the agreement, and thus would not be considered works for hire. Furthermore, the works would have been created during the term of the employment. In such cases, you will most likely retain the copyright to those photographs because the agreements generally apply to works created during the specifi c assignment. Finally, you should strongly consider the benefi ts of registering the copyrights to your photographs. This would allow you to enforce the copyrights in the event your photographs are infringed. This could be important in instances where someone is using images in a manner that you have not authorized. Examples include a competitor who has obtained your images and is using them in their own endeavors or a real estate agent who decides to use the images commercially. The reason why registration is important is that it affects the economics of pursuing a claim. A timely registered copyright often makes the difference between an unauthorized use claim that settles quickly for a decent amount and one that is impractical to pursue. One reason is that if an image is timely registered, a court can award statutory damages in which you do not have to prove any specifi c loss. Depending on the circumstances, courts typically award between $750 and $30,000 per infringed work but may award as low as $200 and as high as $150,000 in extreme cases. Second, a court can award you your attorney fees if the image is timely registered. This is important because copyright litigation is expensive. Conversely, if the images are not timely registered, a sophisticated infringer will often call the copyright owner's bluff, knowing that it will be imprudent to incur a large amount of attorney fees in an attempt to recover a relatively small amount of actual damages. Registering the copyrights to photographs is neither diffi cult, time-consuming, nor expensive. The instructions on how to register copyrights online can be found at the U.S. Copyright Offi ce's website (www.copyright.gov) and are fairly easy to understand. Photographers generally register multiple images at a time because when done in this way, only a single application fee (currently $55) need be paid. Bert Krages is an attorney in Portland, Oregon, who specializes in intellectual property issues. He is the author of Legal Handbook for Photographers.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Location Managers Guild International - Summer 2021