Working Nurse

March - April 2020

Issue link: https://digital.copcomm.com/i/1225425

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 5 of 23

March 23–April 27, 2020 6 Working Nurse l WorkingNurse.com ON THE QUICK Nursing & Healthcare News E ven if artificial intelligence hasn't yet touched your practice, the chances are that it will in the fore- seeable future. A recent National Academy of Medicine report recom- mends that all healthcare professionals learn more about the potential of AI — and its significant limitations. Promise and Risk Anyone who's ever watched "Star Trek" has at least a basic understanding of artificial intelligence: computer pro- grams that can perform complex analy- sis to supplement — and even supplant — human judgment. If you believe the tech industry hype, sophisticated neural networks will soon be able to detect and treat disease as readily as current algorithms predict your online shopping habits. The new report from the National Academy of Medicine (NAM), released December 17, is cautiously enthusiastic about AI's potential to transform every- thing from radiology to medical coding. However, the report also offers some sobering warnings about the limits and risks of healthcare AI. When Computers Take Shortcuts If you've ever asked a child to clean their room and come back to find clothes and toys shoved under the bed rather than put away properly, you've already had a preview of how real-world neural net- works approach decision-making. Artificial intelligence may be logical and efficient, but its strategies and con- clusions aren't always what its users had in mind. One example the NAM report cites is a recent PLOS Medicine study in training neural network algorithms to detect pneumonia based on chest X-rays. During the study, the trainers were puz- zled to find that their AI was significantly better at detecting pneumonia from X- rays taken at the hospital where the AI  was originally trained than from X-rays taken elsewhere. Eventually, the trainers realized the AI was using a trick they hadn't taught it: At the training hospital, the equipment with which an X-ray was taken (which the AI could determine from the image data) gave a good indication of the department the patient was in and thus their acuity, which affected their pneu- monia risk. If the X-rays were taken with unfa- miliar equipment, the neural network couldn't reliably make that correlation and its accuracy suffered. It's easy to see how scenarios like this could be dangerous in clinical practice. For example, the AI might dismiss early signs of pneumonia if a patient were in a unit where pneumonia was uncommon. Worse, clinicians relying on the AI's assessment might not know exactly how or why it reached its faulty conclusion. Bias In, Bias Out The authors of the NAM report say that the biggest limitation of any AI is not the algo- rithms, but the data used to train them. For example, a neural network trained on data from exclusively preteen patients might leap to strange conclu- sions when asked to evaluate an adoles- cent, while an AI trained on data from mostly men might flounder in evaluating female patients. "If the training data are systematically biased due, for example, to underrepre- sentation of individuals of a particular gender, race, age or sexual orientation, those biases will be modeled, propagat- ed and scaled in the resulting algorithm," the authors warn. "The same is true for human biases (intentional and not) operating in the environment, workflow and outcomes from which the data were collected." Keep Your Eyes Open No one expects nurses to analyze flaws in algorithmic design or AI training methodology, but these problems emphasize the importance of human clinical judgment in the deployment and use of artificial intelligence. A nurse who understands the ways biased data or faulty algorithms can pro- duce misleading conclusions — and who speaks up when something doesn't seem to make sense — can help prevent costly or even deadly errors. You can download the full report at nam.edu/artificial-intelligence-special- publication. WN For direct links to the websites cited, find these articles at WorkingNurse.com Artificially Intelligent, Naturally Flawed What nurses should know about the limits of AI TRAINING BIAS As with human providers, where and how healthcare AIs are trained can profoundly affect how they function in real practice.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Working Nurse - March - April 2020