CineMontage

Q3 2017

Issue link: http://digital.copcomm.com/i/855478

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 23 of 65

22 CINEMONTAGE / Q3 2017 them to come to, and then move at, the bargaining table. But all of that pressure paid off. The negotiating team reached a tentative agreement in May of this year, and in June, DTDC employees voted overwhelmingly to ratify their first union agreement. The contract now provides them with Motion Picture Industry Pension and Health benefits; employees' annual savings in premiums alone will range from about $1,500 to about $15,000. They also won a wage schedule that will ensure much-improved pay. The deal provided immediate and retroactive raises, ranging up to 30 percent. Most workers will see raises ranging from 21 to 38 percent over the three-year life of the contract. The contract doesn't solve DTDC employees' every concern, though. There will be more to fight for in future negotiations. These digital cinema technician jobs are still not as highly compensated as the traditional cinetechnician jobs they replaced, and we can't bring those old jobs back. But, because of the courage and cohesion that these employees demonstrated, we were able to ensure that the folks performing this new work have a voice on the job. "This agreement will improve the quality of life for myself, my co-workers and their families. By coming together to have a more powerful voice, we established a mutual respect between technicians and management," Benjamin said. "To have and express conviction for what is right — that truly earns respect. Not just from management, but simply self-respect, too. This is essential in every workplace." f T o all my Local 700 brethren and sistren, A prolonged period away from the cutting room has resulted in my giving a great deal of thought to our collective lives in post-production. Not that type of a break that we all know as "I'm on vacation" — which quickly gives way to "My god, I need a gig!" — but a true respite. Perhaps it's the tranquility of the Wisconsin countryside. Or living in a town where the Calendar Section is... a calendar! Or the fact that at the age of 63, I just may be given to actually enjoying a slower pace. Of course, raising two grandkids, ages two and four, does keep one on one's toes... But as I continue to read about this new "Golden Age" of cable, TV, streaming, etc., and the fine work being done in post (despite the proverbial tight schedules constantly referred to), I find myself asking, "Why does the pay still suck?" Why are editors, mixers and the like told, "Oh, we/they don't pay that rate," or assistants placed in the uncomfortable and unfair position of working in an environment where, "we/they don't pay OT." Sure, they may have their lunches purchased for them — it keeps them in the building, or worse, at their Avids — which is a wise investment on the part of the producers. But fancy items in the pantry shouldn't be considered a "fine perk." The caste system still imposed on those in post-production seems to harken back to when the schism between features and television was very real, clear and finite. However, this "Golden Age" has greatly changed that dynamic. As a feature editor for many, many years, I for one enjoyed the upside of that system. My few forays into non-feature editing in the last couple of years were no less enjoyable or challenging. But they paid less money. Why? Why is cutting a superhero/robot/ ten-minute-car-chase set piece a superior avenue to financial reward than the myriad of amazing non-feature presentations out there? As the Netflixes, Amazons, Hulus, etc., build their Xanadus in Hollywood (or as Joseph Cotten called them in Citizen Kane, "Sloppy Joe's"), I hope that those who work within their state-of-the-art facilities will be given state-of-the-art salaries. Will this letter change anything? Certainly not. But for those in their 20s, 30s and 40s who commit themselves to a life in post, I want to give credit where it's deserved. There should be more to their professional excellence than middling paychecks and a chance to win a shiny gold statue. "Golden Age?" Perhaps for those above the line. But for those of us below? That line seems thicker, harder and more impenetrable than ever. David Moritz, ACE, Picture Editor Sherman Oaks, CA LET TERS TO THE EDITOR Golden Age? Show Me the Coinage GET TING ORGANIZED CONTINUED FROM PAGE 16 My few forays into non-feature editing were no less challenging. But they paid less money. DTDC employee Moshe-Aaron Lopez on the picket line. Photo by Deverill Weekes

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of CineMontage - Q3 2017